Rk
1 Case Western Reserve 12 65 9 62 - - - 479 39.9
2 Carnegie Mellon 11 45 7 42 - - - 333 30.3
3 Washington (Mo.) 9 33 5 32 - - - 245 27.2
Rk
1 Case Western Reserve 12 2244 3008 5252 437.7
2 Carnegie Mellon 11 1613 2469 4082 371.1
3 Washington (Mo.) 9 1041 2473 3514 390.4
Rk
1 Case Western Reserve 12 3008 199-350-8 250.7 8.6 15.1 29
2 Carnegie Mellon 11 2469 186-328-16 224.5 7.5 13.3 24
3 Washington (Mo.) 9 2473 238-374-20 274.8 6.6 10.4 19
Rk
1 Case Western Reserve 12 2244 536 187.0 4.2 33
2 Carnegie Mellon 11 1613 385 146.6 4.2 17
3 Washington (Mo.) 9 1041 325 115.7 3.2 12
Rk
1 Case Western Reserve 12 274 126 130 18 22.8
2 Carnegie Mellon 11 215 75 113 27 19.5
3 Washington (Mo.) 9 197 60 119 18 21.9
Rk
1 Case Western Reserve 12 78-170 46% 15-31 48%
2 Carnegie Mellon 11 47-135 35% 9-21 43%
3 Washington (Mo.) 9 43-138 31% 14-28 50%
Rk
1 Case Western Reserve 12 37-718 19.4 34-365 10.7
2 Carnegie Mellon 11 43-906 21.1 31-406 13.1
3 Washington (Mo.) 9 41-791 19.3 28-267 9.5
Rk
1 Case Western Reserve 12 9-12 75.0% 62-65 95.4% 42-1507 35.9 84-4699 55.9
2 Carnegie Mellon 11 7-13 53.8% 42-45 93.3% 47-2056 43.7 63-3678 58.4
3 Washington (Mo.) 9 5-9 55.6% 32-32 100.0% 46-1824 39.7 46-2609 56.7
Rk
1 Case Western Reserve 12 55-65 85% 46-65 71%
2 Carnegie Mellon 11 36-47 77% 30-47 64%
3 Washington (Mo.) 9 23-32 72% 20-32 63%
Rk
1 Case Western Reserve 12 20-12 13 14 14-92 6.6 2 839 24
2 Carnegie Mellon 11 9-3 12 11 11-151 13.7 2 889 28
3 Washington (Mo.) 9 11-6 3 8 8-67 8.4 2 777 26
Rk
1 Case Western Reserve 12 49 4.1 446 37.2
2 Carnegie Mellon 11 58 5.3 538 48.9
3 Washington (Mo.) 9 53 5.9 502 55.8
Rk
1 Case Western Reserve 12 17.8 214 289.6 167.8 121.8 69.9 14 13 24 2
2 Carnegie Mellon 11 20.9 230 354.1 141.9 212.2 80.8 11 13 28 2
3 Washington (Mo.) 9 28.1 253 395.0 211.4 183.6 86.3 8 3 26 2
Rk
1 Case Western Reserve 12 32:06 8,761 1,753
2 Carnegie Mellon 11 27:30 10,802 2,161
3 Washington (Mo.) 9 23:34 5,770 962
Rk
1 Case Western Reserve 8 48 7 47 - - - 356 44.5
2 Carnegie Mellon 8 35 5 32 - - - 257 32.1
3 Washington (Mo.) - - - - - - - - -
Rk
1 Case Western Reserve 8 1659 2222 3881 485.1
2 Carnegie Mellon 8 1073 1822 2895 361.9
3 Washington (Mo.) - - - - -
Rk
1 Case Western Reserve 8 2222 132-220-5 277.8 10.1 16.8 22
2 Carnegie Mellon 8 1822 131-229-8 227.8 8.0 13.9 21
3 Washington (Mo.) - - 0-0-0 - - - -
Rk
1 Case Western Reserve 8 1659 355 207.4 4.7 24
2 Carnegie Mellon 8 1073 276 134.1 3.9 12
3 Washington (Mo.) - - - - - -
Rk
1 Case Western Reserve 8 192 92 89 11 24.0
2 Carnegie Mellon 8 155 54 81 20 19.4
3 Washington (Mo.) - - - - - -
Rk
1 Case Western Reserve 8 51-103 50% 8-15 53%
2 Carnegie Mellon 8 33-97 34% 8-15 53%
3 Washington (Mo.) - 0-0 - 0-0 -
Rk
1 Case Western Reserve 8 22-433 19.7 28-253 9.0
2 Carnegie Mellon 8 32-694 21.7 21-239 11.4
3 Washington (Mo.) - 0-0 - 0-0 -
Rk
1 Case Western Reserve 8 7-10 70.0% 47-48 97.9% 22-812 36.9 61-3470 56.9
2 Carnegie Mellon 8 5-7 71.4% 32-35 91.4% 36-1562 43.4 47-2741 58.3
3 Washington (Mo.) - 0-0 - 0-0 - 0-0 - 0-0 -
Rk
1 Case Western Reserve 8 39-48 81% 32-48 67%
2 Carnegie Mellon 8 29-36 81% 25-36 69%
3 Washington (Mo.) - 0-0 - 0-0 -
Rk
1 Case Western Reserve 8 14-10 9 9 9-39 4.3 1 574 19
2 Carnegie Mellon 8 6-2 9 7 7-141 20.1 1 655 20
3 Washington (Mo.) - 0-0 - - 0-0 - - 0 -
Rk
1 Case Western Reserve 8 38 4.8 349 43.6
2 Carnegie Mellon 8 43 5.4 408 51.0
3 Washington (Mo.) - - - - -
Rk
1 Case Western Reserve 8 15.9 127 283.9 162.8 121.1 71.8 9 9 19 1
2 Carnegie Mellon 8 22.1 177 383.1 146.0 237.1 81.9 7 11 20 1
3 Washington (Mo.) - - - - - - - - - - -
Rk
1 Case Western Reserve 8 31:04 7,419 1,855
2 Carnegie Mellon 8 26:21 9,446 2,362
3 Washington (Mo.) - 0:00 - -