UAA Volleyball

Conference-Only Statistics

 

Conference Team Leaders

 

HITTING PERCENTAGE S K E TA Pct.
1. Washington U 24 344 104 867 .277
2. Emory 25 348 112 881 .268
3. Chicago 27 358 132 1003 .225
4. Carnegie Mellon 25 298 124 890 .196
5. Rochester 26 325 163 944 .172
6. CWRU 25 289 139 892 .168
7. NYU 24 222 126 781 .123
8. Brandeis 22 202 143 770 .077
 
Opponent Hitting Pct. S K E TA Pct.
1. Emory 25 268 146 878 .139
2. Carnegie Mellon 25 298 163 917 .147
3. Washington U 24 266 128 886 .156
4. Chicago 27 317 144 986 .175
5. Rochester 26 298 133 913 .181
6. CWRU 25 325 122 900 .226
7. NYU 24 329 123 838 .246
8. Brandeis 22 285 84 710 .283
 
ASSISTS S No. Avg/S
1. Washington U 24 328 13.67
2. Emory 25 328 13.12
3. Chicago 27 327 12.11
4. Rochester 26 295 11.35
5. Carnegie Mellon 25 277 11.08
6. CWRU 25 276 11.04
7. NYU 24 212 8.83
8. Brandeis 22 190 8.64
 
KILLS S No. Avg/S
1. Washington U 24 344 14.33
2. Emory 25 348 13.92
3. Chicago 27 358 13.26
4. Rochester 26 325 12.50
5. Carnegie Mellon 25 298 11.92
6. CWRU 25 289 11.56
7. NYU 24 222 9.25
8. Brandeis 22 202 9.18
 
BLOCKS S BS BA Total Avg/S
1. Washington U 24 8 88 52.0 2.17
2. Emory 25 16 64 48.0 1.92
3. Carnegie Mellon 25 27 40 47.0 1.88
4. CWRU 25 15 54 42.0 1.68
5. Rochester 26 7 66 40.0 1.54
6. NYU 24 10 53 36.5 1.52
7. Chicago 27 12 56 40.0 1.48
8. Brandeis 22 7 28 21.0 0.95
 
SERVICE ACES S No. Avg/S
1. Rochester 26 52 2.00
2. Emory 25 47 1.88
Carnegie Mellon 25 47 1.88
4. Washington U 24 38 1.58
5. Chicago 27 42 1.56
6. CWRU 25 37 1.48
7. NYU 24 30 1.25
8. Brandeis 22 26 1.18
 
DIGS S No. Avg/S
1. Chicago 27 478 17.70
2. Washington U 24 418 17.42
3. Emory 25 401 16.04
4. Rochester 26 412 15.85
5. Carnegie Mellon 25 390 15.60
6. CWRU 25 381 15.24
7. NYU 24 335 13.96
8. Brandeis 22 301 13.68
 
 

Conference Individual Leaders

 

(Players listed below have played in at least 51.00 percent of their team's games.)
 
HITTING PERCENTAGE Cl S K E TA Pct.
1. Leimbach,Sydney-Emory SO 25 57 9 102 .471
2. Holler,Jessica-Emory SR 25 79 19 160 .375
3. Gibbons, Jackie-Carnegie Mellon SR 24 62 18 130 .338
4. Dupont,Caroline-Washington U SR 23 75 24 151 .338
5. Pearson, Madison-Chicago FR 20 31 9 66 .333
6. Ufondu,Ifeoma-Washington U SO 24 69 18 156 .327
7. Martinez,Clara-Rochester SO 26 81 21 188 .319
8. Malek,Julianne-Washington U SO 23 55 16 124 .315
9. Pfaff, Kayla-CWRU SR 25 35 9 85 .306
10. Maher,Sarah-Emory SR 25 69 19 167 .299
11. Sheredy,Alex-Washington U SR 24 85 18 225 .298
12. Muisenga, Sarah-Chicago SO 27 102 43 242 .244
13. Donohue, Eliza-Carnegie Mellon JR 25 45 16 124 .234
14. Pinton, Anabella-Chicago FR 27 83 26 248 .230
15. McKnight,Morgan-Emory FR 23 56 24 145 .221
16. Scrafford, Audrey-Chicago SO 25 87 29 271 .214
17. Sims, Haley-CWRU FR 25 46 18 131 .214
18. Ghyzel,Beth-Rochester FR 25 36 12 118 .203
 
KILLS Cl S No. Avg/S
1. Muisenga, Sarah-Chicago SO 27 102 3.78
2. Sheredy,Alex-Washington U SR 24 85 3.54
3. Scrafford, Audrey-Chicago SO 25 87 3.48
4. Dupont,Caroline-Washington U SR 23 75 3.26
5. Holler,Jessica-Emory SR 25 79 3.16
Mueller, Lauren-Carnegie Mellon SO 25 79 3.16
7. Martinez,Clara-Rochester SO 26 81 3.12
8. Pinton, Anabella-Chicago FR 27 83 3.07
9. Ufondu,Ifeoma-Washington U SO 24 69 2.88
10. Lemon, Brianna-CWRU FR 25 69 2.76
Maher,Sarah-Emory SR 25 69 2.76
12. Gibbons, Jackie-Carnegie Mellon SR 24 62 2.58
13. Kocak,Alara-Rochester SO 16 41 2.56
14. McKnight,Morgan-Emory FR 23 56 2.43
15. Malek,Julianne-Washington U SO 23 55 2.39
16. Katz,Shira-Rochester JR 18 42 2.33
17. Barton, Marian-CWRU SR 25 57 2.28
Leimbach,Sydney-Emory SO 25 57 2.28
19. Trinka,Kathryn-Emory SR 25 56 2.24
20. Rapp,Caroline-NYU FR 21 47 2.24
 
ASSISTS Cl S No. Avg/S
1. Stile,Chloe-Washington U FR 22 251 11.41
2. Porter,Sarah-Emory FR 23 243 10.57
3. Risk, Erin-Chicago SR 27 267 9.89
4. Newton, Emily-Carnegie Mellon SR 24 218 9.08
5. Kohler,Aimee-Rochester SR 26 232 8.92
6. Carroll, Shannon-CWRU SO 25 221 8.84
7. Goyette,Kathryn-NYU SO 13 84 6.46
8. Nork, Marlee-Brandeis SO 22 136 6.18
 
SERVICE ACES Cl S No. Avg/S
1. Porter,Sarah-Emory FR 23 14 0.61
2. Yew, Kayla-Carnegie Mellon FR 25 14 0.56
3. Sheredy,Alex-Washington U SR 24 11 0.46
Breuer,Becky-Emory SO 24 11 0.46
5. Bondelid, Karina-CWRU SO 22 10 0.45
6. Martinez,Clara-Rochester SO 26 11 0.42
7. Muisenga, Sarah-Chicago SO 27 11 0.41
8. Singh,Annie-NYU SO 23 9 0.39
9. Grinsfelder,Mira-Emory SO 18 7 0.39
10. Connor,Meghan-Rochester SR 26 10 0.38
11. Risk, Erin-Chicago SR 27 10 0.37
12. Stile,Chloe-Washington U FR 22 8 0.36
13. Vidovich,Courtney-Rochester SO 25 9 0.36
Higgins, Molly-Carnegie Mellon SR 25 9 0.36
15. Miller,Paighton-NYU FR 24 8 0.33
Wang, Jessica-Chicago SO 18 6 0.33
17. Tamura, Christina-CWRU FR 25 8 0.32
Mueller, Lauren-Carnegie Mellon SO 25 8 0.32
19. Nork, Marlee-Brandeis SO 22 7 0.32
20. Baek,Nina-Rochester SR 26 8 0.31
 
BLOCKS Cl S BS BA Total Avg/S
1. Malek,Julianne-Washington U SO 23 3 23 26.0 1.13
2. Holler,Jessica-Emory SR 25 11 17 28.0 1.12
3. Sims, Haley-CWRU FR 25 5 20 25.0 1.00
4. Dupont,Caroline-Washington U SR 23 3 19 22.0 0.96
5. Goldman,Alexandra-Rochester SR 26 5 19 24.0 0.92
6. Donohue, Eliza-Carnegie Mellon JR 25 12 10 22.0 0.88
7. Ellis,Rayne-NYU JR 24 5 16 21.0 0.88
8. Ufondu,Ifeoma-Washington U SO 24 1 18 19.0 0.79
9. Leimbach,Sydney-Emory SO 25 4 15 19.0 0.76
 
DIGS Cl S No. Avg/S
1. Tuohy, Mary Claire-Chicago SR 27 132 4.89
2. Higgins, Molly-Carnegie Mellon SR 25 121 4.84
3. Baxter,Zoe-Washington U FR 24 113 4.71
4. Cho, Yvette-Brandeis SO 22 103 4.68
5. Connor,Meghan-Rochester SR 26 113 4.35
6. Breuer,Becky-Emory SO 24 102 4.25
7. Bondelid, Karina-CWRU SO 22 81 3.68
8. Sheredy,Alex-Washington U SR 24 82 3.42
9. Miller,Paighton-NYU FR 24 79 3.29
10. Kohler,Aimee-Rochester SR 26 85 3.27
11. Napolitano,Grace-NYU JR 21 67 3.19
12. Muisenga, Sarah-Chicago SO 27 85 3.15
13. Maher,Sarah-Emory SR 25 77 3.08
14. Risk, Erin-Chicago SR 27 79 2.93
15. Pinton, Anabella-Chicago FR 27 71 2.63
16. Stephanus,Natalie-Washington U SO 24 63 2.62
17. Wolfenbarger, Emily-CWRU SO 18 46 2.56
18. Goyette,Kathryn-NYU SO 13 33 2.54
19. Yew, Kayla-Carnegie Mellon FR 25 58 2.32
Carroll, Shannon-CWRU SO 25 58 2.32